🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from coastal erosion argue that a lack of decision over how to address the issue is creating avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure sites. Officials maintain it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. People will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline lies the grave of a former paratrooper killed while serving abroad. His mother expressed she could not sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to handle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Some want more sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to choose the path to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. It requires good local conversations to discover the right answers for each community.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.